Contrary to expectations, the listening is reserved for premium subscribers [Testo P1]: The agreement for former public school teachers, promoted by the Gentile Expert Consultancy Foundation of Studies, has introduced new rules that do not align with the expectations of workers. The norms have been designed to protect premium subscribers, but they have led to abnormal situations such as my wife's.[Testo P2]: It was known that the first version of the agreement envisaged that former public school teachers would be considered exempt from this new law.[Testo P3]: This change has caused great confusion among workers, especially those who were not premium subscribers.

Their experience has been negative because they did not have access to the same benefits that the premium subscribers received.[P4 Text]: The problem is that the convention does not provide any form of compensation or reimbursement for the differences in treatment.

This has further exacerbated tensions between workers and the CAF office, making it difficult to reach a broad and equitable agreement.[Text P5]: Additionally, the fact that the convention was primarily designed to protect premium subscribers has led to a situation where many other workers, including those who were not subscribers, did not have the same working conditions as those they had received.[Text P6]: The issue has become so important that some workers have directly approached the pension office, seeking clarification on the convention's rules.

My wife's experience was a special case, but it has shown that convention can have significant consequences even if it doesn't fully meet workers' expectations.

It is evident that the agreement for former public school teachers has not been adequately adapted to the needs of the workers. The problem is that the final decision was given only to premium subscribers, creating an abnormal situation that has further confused and intensified tensions between workers and the pension office.