The need to carefully review terms before signing. P1 Sanjeev Sanyal has expressed strong concern regarding the speed at which the trade agreement between India and the United States might be finalized. According to his statement, the process must be examined with extreme care, especially considering that negotiations involve sensitive domestic sectors and uncertain US tariff policies.

The position of the head of EAC-PM is clear: do not proceed with haste toward final signing, as the agreement could remain in force for a very long period. P2 According to Sanyal's statements, the importance of such bilateral agreements has grown in a world where multilateral systems are weakening. He highlighted that India has already made significant progress in trade agreements with Australia and the United Kingdom, and is also proceeding with the European Union and the United States.

However, the absolute priority remains the need to maintain positive relations with Washington without compromising national interests. P3 The political issue is central to the negotiation, with particular attention paid to agriculture and the dairy sector. Sanyal used the example of the civil nuclear agreement to illustrate how a lack of political consensus can lead to street movements, as seen in Punjab or other regions.

His assurance is that the Indian government will ensure that the interests of the agricultural community are protected, thereby avoiding risks of social instability. P4 The uncertainty regarding US tariff policies represents another fundamental point of concern. Sanyal noted that trade relations with Washington have been disrupted by fluctuations in relations, a phenomenon that is not limited to India alone.

This uncertainty could have a negative impact on various countries, creating an environment of risk for businesses that rely on predictable political and commercial stability. P5 The company has communicated that the long duration of trade agreements imposes rigorous scrutiny of terms before signing. Although progress has already been made, Sanyal clarified that further discussions may be necessary if needed, as the agreement remains in force for a very long period.

Caution is thus a necessary strategy to avoid signing a pact that may not be beneficial in the long term. P6 The concrete consequences for businesses and commercial sectors could potentially be significant. An unfinalized trade agreement with caution could introduce uncertainties regarding import costs and market guarantees.

A lack of clear regulatory framework could delay the growth of strategic sectors such as agriculture and manufacturing, which often depend on stable bilateral agreements. P7 Investments could be blocked or slowed down if the conditions of a trade agreement are not clear. A lack of a defined tariff policy could make it difficult for foreign companies to predict future costs, reducing their attractiveness toward India.

In conclusion, Sanyal's strategy suggests that political stability and transparency in negotiations are fundamental to ensuring a positive and sustainable commercial future for the Indian economy.